In the article “The Paradox of Howl,” Stephen Burt argues
that Allen Ginsberg’s “Howl” is hypocritical in that it captures and foresees
the beginning of a new culture, but at the same time draws most of its
information from the past. “Howl” imitates 17th-century stanzaic
poetry and observes the author’s own life experiences and his generation’s
concerns. Ginsberg analyzed his classmates’ conformity to societal standards
and the problems with his mentally ill mother. Ginsberg also draws from his
time in the Columbia Psychiatric Institute with his fellow patient Carl
Solomon. The poet is against Solomon’s confinement and uses his case as an
example of the confinement of passion, self-expression and free thought in
America. In that way, the poem resembles past European literature and existing
ideas, such as that of the French comic playwright Molière. It is clear, that
Ginsberg is not the first writer who is anti-establishment and that he has
learned and drawn from many minds in the past. But what separated Ginsberg from
the rest is the attention and intensity in the response he received after
publishing his poem, which is mostly a result of the post-war time it was
published in.
No comments:
Post a Comment